We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."It is a good product for what it does...So, it is one of the most critical systems that we have."
"The RADIUS Server holds the most value."
"The posture assessment is a valuable feature because of the ability to do assessments on the clients before they connect to the network."
"For my use cases, the in-depth troubleshooting into why a client can't connect or why they failed, is very valuable. I can go back to someone and say, 'Hey, it's not my network. It's their certificates or user error,' or something else."
"It's scalable."
"The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system."
"Easy to use and provides good support"
"The authorization and accounts inside of ISE are very useful for us."
"Enables IT department to force very complex passwords for certain users."
"The generator of complex passwords keeps me safe from being hacked."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"Keeper has strong security features."
"It has a double authentication factor increasing the security level."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"The admin interface is really slow. It's horrible."
"I would like to see the product simplified more, especially with the configuration."
"Some of the reporting could be improved."
"The templates could be better. When you have to do certs, especially with X.500 certs, it isn't very intuitive."
"A lot of people tell you the hardware requirements for ISE are pretty substantial. If you're running a virtual environment, you're going to be dedicating quite a bit of resources to an ISE VM. That is something that could be worked on."
"We would definitely like to see a little bit of an improvement in the web GUI navigation. Some of the things are a little bit hidden in the drop-down menu. If we could get a way to get to those quicker, it'd be much more useful."
"The primary issue is the slowness of the application and the web interface. We have multiple admin nodes and app nodes. So when I need to get some information about a particular user, the GUI would take ten to fifteen seconds in loading when we need to know right away."
"When I work with customers to do my knowledge transfer, they're really overwhelmed with the navigation of the product and the number of things you can do with it. From a user interface standpoint, Cisco could focus on making certain tasks a bit more guided and easier for customers to walk through. That is, a user-friendly interface and streamlined workflows would be great."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"Ability to store 'files' from IOS & Android devices. You can store pics from these devices currently. Most file formats can be uploaded from PC's/Macs"
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"Room for improvement in my eyes would be being able to share my credit cards and other types of information. The only thing they really share is passwords, and you can only do it with one password at a time. When you're trying to share it out or trying to remove it from being shared, you can't do multiple selections."
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 136 reviews while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault and LastPass.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.