Cisco Nexus vs HPE ProCurve comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,871 views|2,161 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,059 views|2,664 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Nexus and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is stability. We have a pretty large campus.""The most valuable feature is the Bluetooth console.""We have found that logical tenant segregation to be the most useful feature.""Its easy management is most valuable. It is easy to use, easy to manage, stable, and very reliable.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its speed.""Cisco Nexus is a stable solution.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the power.""Its low latency is most valuable. Its performance is good, and it is also very stable."

More Cisco Nexus Pros →

"The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops.""The most valuable features of HPE ProCurve are the reports, lifetime warranty, and CLI.""The user interface is simple to use.""One of the biggest things in HPE ProCurve that I like, though not necessarily a feature, is the HPE warranty because it's probably better than any of the other vendors that we deal with, as it has a lifetime replacement. Feature-wise, the web interface of HPE ProCurve is typically pretty good and I like that as well.""HPE ProCurve is used to connect servers and storage in the data center.""It is stable, and it fulfills our needs. We have all the functions we need, so we're totally satisfied.""The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us.""It's easy to manage and configure. The configurations can be exported and imported to another solution."

More HPE ProCurve Pros →

Cons
"Cisco Nexus still needs more stability.""The cost of the support can be improved. We had critical operations, and we needed 24/7 support for 365 days, which was quite expensive. We had to go for a very costly support contract, which was really a concern. The availability of spare parts, especially in a remote location such as Egypt, can also be improved.""The initial setup is always complex.""There is some room for improvement when it comes to the frequency on the network.""There is room for improvement in the pricing. The solution is expensive. Compared to other vendors, it's costly for similar products.""One of our switches died last week and we were able to RMA it. Within four hours it arrived on time and worked.""The licensing is very complicated. They should work to simplify it.""There's been a little bit of bugginess in the code, but that happens."

More Cisco Nexus Cons →

"They should learn from other vendors, such as Cisco. They all have a few specific routing features. HPE doesn't have any cheap BGP solution.""We do occasionally have issues with the solution and need to change out the switches sometimes. This can be due to the fan, but, in most cases, it's because the power supply was broken.""I don't have any recommendations for areas of improvement.""These switches can be made more stable and robust.""The CLI is a bit confusing. It is not the easiest to manage, especially if you come from a Cisco environment.""I would like to see integration with HPE OneView.""Since we transfer from one gigabit to ten gigabits of information, in a future release, it would benefit to have more high-speed ports.""The product must provide something similar to Cisco’s command-line interface."

More HPE ProCurve Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Costs more than most, but the reliability pays for the difference."
  • "The price of this solution is good when compared to others in the market."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year."
  • "Every Cisco product is more expensive than competitors on the market, which is just a fact, but from my perspective, it is worth it."
  • "All of our costs including subscription, licensing, and support services are bundled together, and the cost is approximately $100,000 USD per year."
  • "This is a very expensive product."
  • "The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."
  • "Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $200 USD per month."
  • More Cisco Nexus Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You buy the switch and that's it."
  • "The cost of HPE ProCurve is good."
  • "The purchasing cost a few years ago for two units was approx €5,000."
  • "This is an expensive switch."
  • "The price of this product is cheap."
  • "HPE ProCurve products are reasonably priced."
  • "The price could be more competitive."
  • "We are a public company, so we are obliged to take the best offer from the vendors. They gave us the best price for the needs we had. It was considerably less than Cisco. It had maybe 40% lower cost."
  • More HPE ProCurve Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:HPE ProCurve is used to connect servers and storage in the data center.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing could be made cheaper.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    2,871
    Comparisons
    2,161
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    8.7
    2nd
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    3,059
    Comparisons
    2,664
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ProCurve, HP ProCurve
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.
    HP Networking (HP ProCurve) products enable a cost-effective network that's agile, flexible, and fully interoperable. Boost availability, performance, monitoring, and productivity with HP network software, services, and support.
    Sample Customers
    Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Government19%
    Retailer14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Educational Organization9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Nexus is ranked 6th in LAN Switching with 101 reviews while HPE ProCurve is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 36 reviews. Cisco Nexus is rated 8.4, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Nexus writes " Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment". Cisco Nexus is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Juniper QFX Series Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches and HPE A-Series, whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Aruba Instant On Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches. See our Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.