We performed a comparison between Cisco Prime and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications."The solution helps with the management and support of the enterprise network."
"As a large organization, it is difficult to individually monitor every device. Instead, we use Cisco Prime to keep an eye on the network and services. We do not use it as a node tool, as we have other tools for network operation centers. When services go down, it can cause issues, we rely on Cisco Prime to monitor and notify us of any service disruptions. We mainly use Cisco Prime Infrastructure for configuration-level tasks."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is the heat maps."
"The solution provides data that allows us to time travel through logs and perform remote operations or troubleshooting."
"Cisco Prime allows us to manage all the wireless controllers and access points."
"Has a good wireless heatmap and search management features."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is its excellent audio and video conferencing with clear quality and no interruptions."
"Cisco Prime allows us to do a lot of functions with the users and it is flexible."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers."
"I would love for Cisco Prime to show bandwidth usage and consumption, but I can't monitor bandwidth usage at a given time."
"I would rate the scalability of Cisco Prime a six out of ten. To scale up from a hundred to a thousand devices, the platform needs to be rebuilt logically. This process might require a downtime window and may involve changing the hardware or upgrading to a larger appliance."
"This solution could be improved if it could monitor configuration changes."
"Cisco Prime could improve the graphical user interface."
"They can also improve the management of more enterprise devices."
"If you think about a centralized monitoring system, Cisco Prime is not good because it does not support third-party vendors like Palo Alto or FortiGate."
"Cisco Prime needs to have lower prices and more customization options."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Prime is ranked 2nd in Network Management Applications with 35 reviews while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 12th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Cisco Prime is rated 7.8, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Prime writes "Robust, cost-effective, and provides good visibility, but the scalability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". Cisco Prime is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Aruba Airwave, Huawei eSight and HPE Intelligent Management Center, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.