Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Superdome X comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,034 views|1,517 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,995 views|1,303 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Superdome X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies.""The Dual Fabric design allows for online/in-service upgrades during production with no impact.""The initial setup is simple, and not very complex.""The platform has valuable features for management and good monitoring tools. It provides efficient insights.""The most valuable feature is the ability to replace a server with another one, simply by applying the profile""The most valuable features of the solution are stability and security.""The product is easy to use.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pros →

"One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it.""The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience.""This product is very reliable.""I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.""SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications.""Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server.""We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good."

More HPE Superdome X Pros →

Cons
"The UCS manager interface needs to be cleaned up a bit and can be streamlined, but no major complaints.""The configuration is a little bit complicated and could be made simpler.""This product uses a converged network adapter because it is the only way to provide flexibility with both fiber and ethernet connections.""The solution is difficult to set up.""It needs a better UI. Cisco makes a great product, but doesn't know how to make a UI.""The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable.""The upgrades could be improved."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Cons →

"It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online.""I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger.""HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud.""What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver."""I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported.""In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful."

More HPE Superdome X Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
  • "Make sure you work with a vendor partner than can get you a substantial discount off of list pricing."
  • "The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable."
  • "Cisco products are at the high end in terms of cost, but everything is included with the licensing fees."
  • "The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."
  • "The pricing for Cisco products is always high."
  • "Pricing with Cisco is very high."
  • More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."
  • "The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."
  • More HPE Superdome X Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.
    Top Answer:It is not a yearly subscription but a yearly support renewal that you need to do for Cisco UCS B-Series.
    Top Answer:There are some shortcomings in the product when you look at it from the perspective of the area involving multiple configurations, making it an aspect where improvements are required. The server… more »
    Top Answer:I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.
    Top Answer:In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    2,034
    Comparisons
    1,517
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.6
    6th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    1,995
    Comparisons
    1,303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
    HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X
    Learn More
    Overview
    Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.
    HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.
    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
    Pella
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while HPE Superdome X is ranked 6th in Blade Servers with 11 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while HPE Superdome X is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Superdome X writes "Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration ". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and PowerEdge C, whereas HPE Superdome X is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.