Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Dell PowerEdge XE Servers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rack Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has centralized our server management and allows us to treat servers like a pool of resources instead of discrete devices.""The product's stability is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.""The VIC card is the most important feature.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the expansion and replacement of parts.""The solution is easily scalable.""Its hardware is really reliable. We also like Cisco for its support.""The solution is stable.""It is very nice and stable with an easy administration GUI."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Pros →

"One of the most valuable features of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is the ease of fixing issues if there are any.""The most valuable feature is the trusted platform module.""The most valuable feature of these servers is the ability to store a lot—the capacity and the number of hard disk drives.""Its reliability and consistency are most valuable.""The most valuable feature is that it can support up to 32 drives of internal storage.""The solution is flexible in my experience.""The strong point of this solution is its compatibility with VMware and its resilience.""In general, it works well. We haven't had issues."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Pros →

Cons
"I think the pricing is high. Cisco has to look for bundling this solutions with other applications.""Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers can improve by providing customization features to allow us to deploy them on the cloud. For example, we need VMware to allow us to accomplish a cloud deployment.""The product must add customer-friendly monitoring features.""Some customers have complained about delivery time. So, the main weakness is the lead time.""The solution needs more capacity and more scalability.""The improvement should be done as per customer requirements.""The solution can be improved by adjusting the cost.""Technical support could be more responsive."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Cons →

"Dell PowerEdge XE Servers can improve by adapting HCI technology.""It should be easier to extend PowerEdge XE servers. We haven't architected them with an eye toward scalability. They have a fixed number of slots for hard drives, which is enough for our present use case, However, we would have more options if we could extend that. We could deploy the servers in a broader range of use cases with different requirements. It's fine for our current deployment with only a few thousand users. We're exploring other solutions like such as VxRail or PowerFlex for larger public-facing use cases.""In future releases, there should be more support options for the latest processor.""We use OpenManager a lot, and that can be a bit clunky at times. They can make that better.""The quality and reliability could be improved.""The support team must improve the speed of response.""It is mostly stable, but the usual problem would be, for example, upgrading to a newer version of VMware or dealing with compatibility issues during the process.""I would like to have support for performing a detailed analysis of the server from a mobile device."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If they plan to expand their infrastructure in periods, then simply Cisco is not a good choice."
  • "​Best to buy all the blades configured for the same purposes of load balancing and failover or load shifting.​"
  • "Cisco is expensive, but we didn't look at the cost of the product. We were looking at reliability and support."
  • "This product is slightly more expensive when compared to others."
  • "This product is quite expensive and it would be better if it were cheaper."
  • "This solution is a little expensive."
  • "The solution could be more cost-effective."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis, which is only $2,000 or $3,000."
  • More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are different types of licensing available, that works well for customers. The product is not very much to purchase."
  • "If you want an SLA for parts and equipment then you need to purchase a support agreement."
  • "This solution is priced very reasonably."
  • "You always want slightly cheaper, but overall, they are quite comparable and quite neutral."
  • "The pricing model is quite competitive."
  • "Dell has competitive pricing."
  • More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The resource management features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The support team must improve the speed of response. The product should be promoted more in the market.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Views
    5,091
    Comparisons
    2,794
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    332
    Rating
    8.4
    10th
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Views
    626
    Comparisons
    370
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    327
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Unified Computing System C-Series, Cisco UCS C-Series
    PowerEdge XE Servers
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.

    Our newest addition to the Dell EMC PowerEdge family, PowerEdge XE servers are purpose-built for complex, harsh and compute-intensive workloads.

    Sample Customers
    Advanced Medical Transport, Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Artoni Transporti, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, City of Mississauga, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Kind en Gezin, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Nationwide, Quest, Talbots, University of St. Gallen
    Epsilon, ROZETTA CORP, JIGUANG, RACKSPACE, NEW BELGIUM BREWING
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Individual & Family Service6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    University6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Media Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is ranked 5th in Rack Servers with 29 reviews while Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is ranked 10th in Rack Servers with 10 reviews. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is rated 8.4, while Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers writes "The VIC card is the most important feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers writes "We're hardly using 15 percent of their computing power, so there's a lot left over that we could utilize". Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, Dell XR2 Rugged Server and IBM Power Systems, whereas Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is most compared with HPE Apollo, Dell XR2 Rugged Server, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers and Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. See our Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers report.

    See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.