We compared Cisco Webex Experience Management and Freshdesk across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Cisco Webex Experience Management is notable for its ability to analyze real-time customer feedback, provide customizable surveys, perform sentiment analysis, and generate comprehensive reports. Freshdesk stands out for its ease of use and customizability. It enables users to connect with different folders and integrate seamlessly. Reviewers also mentioned Freshdesk’s strong reporting and comprehensive knowledge base.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Webex Experience Management could improve its user interface, reporting, and analytics capabilities. Freshdesk could improve its ticketing system, reporting templates, integration with Freshcaller, and implementation of feature requests.
Service and Support: Cisco Webex received positive reviews for its responsive and efficient support team. Freshdesk’s customer service is regarded as efficient and prompt. Users described it as excellent, speedy, and attentive.
Ease of Deployment: Cisco Webex Experience Management is commended for its trouble-free setup, and professional support is available for those who need it. Freshdesk’s setup is quick, painless, and can be completed without outside help.
Pricing: Reviewers have provided no information regarding the cost of Cisco Webex Experience Management. Opinions about Freshdesk’s pricing are mixed. Some find it competitive and affordable, while others find it expensive, particularly when expanding or adding features.
ROI: Reviewers have left no feedback on the ROI of Cisco Webex Experience Management. Freshdesk improves the efficiency of customer management, addressing requests, and organizing documentation, resulting in a favorable return on investment.
Comparison Results: Users like Cisco Webex Experience Management for its easy deployment and real-time feedback analysis. However, it has a complicated user interface, and the solution’s reporting and analytics features are limited. Freshdesk is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface, easy setup process, customizable features, seamless connectivity, and efficient reporting abilities. Still, there is room for improvement in areas like ticketing, integrations, reporting templates, and pricing.
"It works well in general, we haven't had any issues with it. It is stable and useful."
"It is quite easy to program custom apps and integrate them."
"Its simplicity is most valuable. It is easy and simple, and it requires negligible training effort. I don't spend all my time goofing around trying to find stuff in the ticketing system."
"The most valuable features of Freshdesk are the automation of tickets to assign them to different agents, and the managing of documents is easy."
"The organization that is possible with other departments is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"We have made use of the training academy and the technical support team from Freshdesk. Both have been very good resources."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the way that it connects to various folders especially because we use it as a CRM tool. We can connect it with our phones and our chat, and also with the API and have it as an email service. Freshdesk just makes our life easier."
"Their knowledge base is phenomenal. The way that it learns from our users is awesome, and responses are really awesome as well. It does a pretty good job of picking up what's needed. The knowledge bases are great."
"Freshdesk has allowed us to measure and track the response and resolution time of tickets which has been reduced from seven to eight hours down to 30 minutes to one hour."
"It is very expensive but there are no additional charges after it's purchased."
"It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities."
"If Freshdesk had forms in it so that I could go to the portal and fill out a service request, that would improve it immensely and make it more valuable for enterprise customers, but that's not a current functionality. You can't have a certain catalog of any type. You can't be like, "Hey, I want to just go submit a ticket," and then type in. You can't prompt them to ask anything. It is just a blank form."
"While it's good for a small number of tickets, definitely in the future, we will require something more powerful."
"I would like to see a little bit more color in the solution."
"I would like on-the-go translation,"
"There are some restrictions where you need automation and sometimes there is just no way to achieve what you need."
"There aren't any features that we want to enhance, but we need to mature in our usage of some of them. I can't say any feature is missing or needs improvement, but a tool's built-in features need to evolve customer feedback. We have a dialogue set up for that kind of feedback."
"The reporting, analysis modules and insights capabilities for this solution could be improved."
Cisco Webex Experience Management is ranked 10th in Customer Experience Management with 1 review while Freshdesk is ranked 2nd in Customer Experience Management with 27 reviews. Cisco Webex Experience Management is rated 6.0, while Freshdesk is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Webex Experience Management writes "Very stable but exceptionally costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Freshdesk writes "Incredibly user-friendly, flexible, and affordable". Cisco Webex Experience Management is most compared with Teradata Customer Interaction Manager, whereas Freshdesk is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ServiceNow, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Spiceworks and TOPdesk.
See our list of best Customer Experience Management vendors.
We monitor all Customer Experience Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.