We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Provides good performance and speed."
"Its ease of use and how everybody can easily work through it are the most valuable features."
"The stability of the solution is perfect."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product is straightforward."
"The session monitoring capability is good."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"The platform is easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"If the solution had a more advanced DNS, it would be an improvement."
"While connectivity is not something that is under Citrix's control, if the connectivity is spotty, it can be difficult."
"The product should be more secure."
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"The tool must provide better integration and connectivity."
"I would like to see better configuration of repairs and downloading certification."
"Their VAS product should be more productive because right now, we are using other VAS solutions but not using this one."
"The load balancing could be improved."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
Citrix Gateway is ranked 2nd in SSL VPN with 33 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server, AWS Direct Connect and Symantec VIP Access Manager. See our Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.