We performed a comparison between Citrix Hypervisor and Nutanix AHV Virtualization based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is extremely stable."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Citrix Hypervisor is simple to use."
"The price is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution integrates well with other solutions, which makes it really strong as a primary solution to deploy."
"The most valuable features are being able to host many virtual machines and being able to patch machines."
"The feature I find most valuable, is its performance"
"The compatibility of the solution is its most valuable feature. It's compatible on almost every cloud these days."
"Nutanix's customer support is good, one of its biggest selling points."
"The storage features and volume system are great."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix AHV is that it can be managed through Hyper-V, which is Microsoft's hypervisor, VMware, and Citrix XenServer."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"The entirety of the infrastructure resides in the same product, which makes it easy to troubleshoot and investigate problems."
"The dashboard of the solution is one of its strongest points."
"The initial setup of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is straightforward."
"With AHV, you can run micro-segmentation, which is, on the network security level, to have network virtualization across clouds."
"The licensing costs are too high on the solution. They should work to make the costs more reasonable."
"Citrix could provide more tools to help the client manage the solution because we need to build our own tools in some cases. Everything is available through PowerShell, but then you need to build your own scripts to do the more advanced work."
"We'd like them to add more automation to the product."
"You need a licensed account to look up technical support."
"The solution should be more flexible and allow for greater customization."
"The solution is only in English. It would be ideal if it was in Portuguese."
"The main problem with Citrix Hypervisor is getting readily available backup solutions for it. It would be wonderful if Hypervisor were better integrated with third-party backup solutions."
"The product could be faster and licensing options could be improved."
"I would like to see better decompression or degrouping of the VMs so that we can use a single number of SQLs with two servers. We don't need a huge number of DXSPs."
"There is no web interface with AHV."
"Adding even more integrations would be an improvement."
"The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious."
"It's not a very scalable product."
"There are times when consultants, construction, or building firms need to use Beam but it can be difficult."
"To face no complications in our company, we had to switch off virtual machines one after the other before heading to Nutanix platform and going to edge services to switch off and turn off everything, making it a challenging process for me."
"The solution can be pricey."
Citrix Hypervisor is ranked 8th in Server Virtualization Software with 45 reviews while Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 44 reviews. Citrix Hypervisor is rated 8.2, while Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Citrix Hypervisor writes "Good features, fair pricing, and excellent reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". Citrix Hypervisor is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM and Oracle VM, whereas Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM and RHEV. See our Citrix Hypervisor vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
