We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and IBM Netezza Performance Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support."
"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"It is helpful to gather and process data."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The most valuable features of the IBM Netezza Performance Server are the NPS server because of the reduced maintenance and overall good performance."
"The performance is most important to me, and it helps our ability to make business decisions quickly."
"The benefit is really because of the additional speed that we have and, truth be told, the more updated ETL processes and the revamped scheduler in general."
"Distribution concurrency control."
"The data governance prospect... from what I've seen, that is a really powerful tool as well, to help with data lineage and keeping track of that."
"The underlying hardware that IBM provides with this appliance is made for a specific purpose, to serve performance on a large amount of data, and to do analytics as well. It is faster, when you compare it to any other product."
"IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution."
"The most valuable feature would be the fact that it has been running for awhile in an appliance format."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."
"There are multiple bugs when we update."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there is a lot of things that need to improve."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"The one thing that we struggled with predominately was support. Because it was relatively new, support was always a big issue and I think it's still a bit of an ongoing concern with the team currently managing it."
"The scalability is not as expected. The capacity in the black box is not enough."
"IBM Netezza Performance Server could improve its interface, support for big data, and APA-based connectivity should be available."
"The only issue is that it's not expandable."
"Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server."
"Concurrency limit needs to be increased somewhat."
"In terms of features that I would like to see, one is the ability to actually scale out an architecture. Right now, if you buy one, it's fixed. There is no scale-up availability at all."
"Our main problem with it is concurrency. When there are too many users running Netezza at the same time, this is when we have the most complaints."
"LIke Teradata, we can’t add a node/SPU to the existing appliance."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
More IBM Netezza Performance Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while IBM Netezza Performance Server is ranked 10th in Data Warehouse with 33 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while IBM Netezza Performance Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Netezza Performance Server writes "A cost-effective data warehousing tool, but security features like TDE encryption are missing". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas IBM Netezza Performance Server is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Oracle Database, Snowflake, Teradata and SQL Server. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.