We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."Very good end-to-end security features."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."
"The most valuable feature is Impala, the querying engine, which is very fast."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"The solution is stable."
"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"The competitors provide better functionalities."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"There is a maximum of a one-gigabyte block size, which is an area of storage that can be improved upon."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"This is a very expensive solution."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."
"There are multiple bugs when we update."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in Hadoop with 47 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
