We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"In terms of scalability, if you have enough hardware you can scale out. Scalability doesn't have any issues."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"The product is completely secure."
"The solution is stable."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"Very good end-to-end security features."
"The solution is extremely stable. That's the most important aspect of the solution, for our organization. There is no downtime, and the performance is very good."
"What I like best about SAP HANA is that it's faster than Microsoft SQL Server."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The in-memory computing and the efficient response time are very good features."
"It is very stable and very innovative. You can integrate many applications with it."
"The in-memory database is excellent."
"The solution is stable."
"All features are valuable."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"They should focus on upgrading their technical capabilities in the market."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"The pricing needs to improve."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"The solution does not support multiple languages very well and this means users need to create work-arounds to implement some solutions."
"SAP HANA isn't user-friendly, and it's very hard to train newcomers to use it."
"I would like to see improvements in the connectivity of the solution with other BI software. Not every software can connect to it natively."
"The solution could improve by having better migration flexibility. For example, it would be helpful if there was a way for customers could check their nonproduction and production deployments."
"High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"The openness of the system could be more developed. The solution should go into the cloud. The cloud mechanism should be more invested."
"The JDBC connectors are very slow."
"Technical support could be better."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in Hadoop with 47 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 1st in Embedded Database with 79 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and SQream DB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.