We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"The price of this solution could be lowered."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and SingleStore, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. ScyllaDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.