We performed a comparison between CloverETL and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"With this solution, there is the potential to expand, so that you can immediately write code onto the SQL server."
"The most valuable features for our company are the flexibility and the quick turn around time in producing simple ETL solutions."
"You can get data from any data source with SSIS and dump it to any outside source. It is helpful. Getting, extracting, converting, and dumping data doesn't require much effort because we can do everything in the user interface. You drag and drop, then give the required input. It's intuitive."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to use and it offers a flexible custom script task."
"The performance is better than doing it in some alternative ways. We don't have to worry about so much manual work."
"The most valuable feature of SSIS is that it can handle real complex transformations."
"The product's deployment phase is easy."
"Overall, it's a good product."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"It's a legacy tool, that is nearing the end of its useful life."
"The solution could improve by having quicker release updates."
"The debugging could be improved because when it came to solving the errors that I've experienced in the past, I've had to look at the documentation for more information."
"Improvement as per customer requirements."
"We've had issues in terms of the amount of data that is transferred when we are scheduling."
"We have issues with SSIS connectors while extracting data from Excel sources."
"A change in the metadata source cripples the whole ETL process, requiring each module to be manually reopened."
"Options for scaling could be improved."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration while SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". CloverETL is most compared with Talend Open Studio and iWay Universal Adapter Framework, whereas SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue. See our CloverETL vs. SSIS report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
