We performed a comparison between CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 and Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SaaS Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 is its restore functionality."
"The tool's porting of targeted sources in CSV was a nice feature. The integration and connection between the tenants were smooth. We could access a template CSV as well."
"The most valuable feature of Veeam Backup for Office 365 is its performance. Additionally, the user interface and documentation are easy to use and navigate."
"The support offered by both Veeam and our third party supplier is excellent."
"The product offers good stability."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the replication functionality."
"We are able to store it on various cloud providers such as Amazon S3, Rocket, Azure, and IBM Cloud. It can also do on-premise integration, and we are able to use storage from on-premise. We are also able to recover data. It is a really good and intuitive solution. Veeam has developed a fantastic product. I've never seen anything that I don't like about Veeam. It looks like a very complete solution. It is really mature, simple to use, and quite interrogative. It also has APIs for writing scripts."
"The solution helps reduce our workload."
"The most valuable feature is that we don't need different agents to back up our files from different accounts."
"The tool is easy to use and straightforward regarding restoration and creating backups. It's user-friendly, providing results and sending alerts when something goes wrong."
"There is room to improve in managing email signatures."
"I attempted to modify the XML files in the product's configuration to enhance the speed and efficiency of the process. While the KBs and documentation were well-written, technical aspects related to speed adjustment parameters were unclear."
"The solution should provide more integration with Teams and SharePoint Online to perform other tasks."
"Currently, I'm working for Huawei and they dropped the support for Huawei, so that's an issue for us."
"They don't have native integration with deduplication of storage."
"The solution should have backup integration features, not just concerning mail but also when it comes to such solutions as SharePoint."
"It's a new product. It's not mature."
"They could include WAN acceleration to compress the traffic to make things faster."
"They should improve the backup and restoration time."
"Veeam Backup for Office 365 can improve by adding more features with Microsoft teams. We have many files that we are working on with Microsoft teams and there should be more integration and features."
More CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 is ranked 16th in SaaS Backup with 2 reviews while Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is ranked 2nd in SaaS Backup with 57 reviews. CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 is rated 7.6, while Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 writes "Streamlines our processes and makes everything more efficient and less prone to errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 writes "Safe storage, reliable, and easy to use". CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 is most compared with , whereas Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is most compared with AvePoint Cloud Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Cirrus Backup, Commvault Cloud and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our CodeTwo Backup for Office 365 vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.