Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud are both endpoint protection platforms (EPP) that provide comprehensive security for business endpoints like laptops, desktops and servers. They offer core capabilities like anti-malware, firewall, web filtering, application control and more to prevent, detect and respond to cyber threats.
Users appreciate Comodo's default-deny approach with auto-containment of unknown files, which provides strong protection against zero-day threats. The centralized management console makes it easy to deploy and manage Comodo across all endpoints. Comodo also includes patch management and remote monitoring and management (RMM) features.
Seqrite reviewers highlight the simplicity and ease of use of the cloud-based management portal. They find Seqrite effective at preventing malware infections and give high marks to support. Seqrite provides asset management, vulnerability scan, data loss prevention (DLP) and mobile device management (MDM) functionality.
Both solutions are compatible with Windows, Mac and Linux endpoints. Based on the reviews, Comodo is used more by smaller businesses and Seqrite more by mid-sized companies.
In summary, Comodo has an edge in zero-day threat prevention with its default-deny/auto-containment approach. Seqrite's fully cloud-based architecture and integrated MDM make it attractive for companies with mobile workforces. Proof of concepts are recommended to see which works best in your environment.
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It's stable and reliable."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"Seqrite has significantly reduced the time it takes to detect and respond."
"The solution installs very easily."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The security is too week and needs improvement."
"The solution should focus on security, documentation, and simplicity for beginners."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 33rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 14 reviews while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is ranked 57th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 2 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is rated 4.6. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud writes "Reduces the time to detect and respond with moderate pricing". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Norton Small Business.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.