We performed a comparison between Confluent and IBM Streams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics.Confluent is ranked 4th in Streaming Analytics with 19 reviews while IBM Streams is ranked 15th in Streaming Analytics with 5 reviews. Confluent is rated 8.4, while IBM Streams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Confluent writes "Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Streams writes "A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations". Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, AWS Glue and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas IBM Streams is most compared with Apache Spark, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Flink, Amazon MSK and Google Cloud Dataflow.
See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.