We performed a comparison between Coralogix and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent."
"Previously, it was a little bit difficult to find where an incident came from, including which IP address and which country. So in Sentinel, it's very easy to find where the incident came from since we can easily get the information from the dashboard, after which we take action quickly."
"Microsoft Sentinel provides the capability to integrate different log sources. On top of having several data connectors in place, you can also do integration with a threat intelligence platform to enhance and enrich the data that's available. You can collect as many logs and build all the use cases."
"It's pretty powerful and its performance is pretty good."
"There are a lot of things you can explore as a user. You can even go and actively hunt for threats. You can go on the offensive rather than on the defensive."
"The analytics has a lot of advantages because there are 300 default use cases for rules and we can modify them per our environment. We can create other rules as well. Analytics is a useful feature."
"Microsoft Sentinel comes preloaded with templates for teaching and analytics rules."
"The UI-based analytics are excellent."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very stable, easy to get going, and easy to manage. It is also easy to review all incidents."
"It allows us to search data both on-premises and on the cloud."
"It has a powerful GUI where you can put together your use cases, and don't have to write your own scripts."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"I have used IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics in a Cloud Pak on Amazon, and there it runs on top of it and is easy to assess. Additionally, I have installed processes and characters."
"Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"The most valuable feature is user behavior analytics (UBA)."
"I think this is a good product for enterprises because of the performance and out-of-the-box rules and use cases. If they want to reach the maturity level early, they can use these out-of-the-box rules and use cases. That will help them a lot."
"The KQL query does not function effectively with Windows 11 machines, and in the majority of machine-based investigations, KQL queries are essential for organizing the data during investigations."
"If Sentinel had a graphical user interface, it would be easier to use. I would also like it to be more customizable."
"I think the number one area of improvement for Sentinel would be the cost."
"The dashboards can be improved. Creating dashboards is very easy, but the visualizations are not as good as Microsoft Power BI. People who are using Microsoft Power BI do not like Sentinel's dashboards."
"The interface could be more user-friendly. It''s a small improvement that they could make if they wanted to."
"For certain vendors, some of the data that Microsoft Sentinel captures is redacted due to privacy reasons."
"The solution could be more user-friendly; some query languages are required to operate it."
"Sometimes, it is hard for us to estimate the costs of Microsoft Sentinel."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The implementation and configuration are not easy."
"In a future release, the solution could provide malware analysis."
"I don't give it a 10 because it is something we have to request. I would love it if UBA was included out of the box like Microsoft."
"It is very difficult to activate all of the network equipment, and it would help if it were made easier."
"AI is superb but need improvements."
"It is not app based."
"The API integration for AD is a problem when it comes to vulnerability management. If you want to incorporate multiple factor authentication it becomes a problem with the AD. It doesn't integrate well. That needs to be improved."
"There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models."
Coralogix is ranked 23rd in Log Management with 7 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM, Elastic Security and Sentinel. See our Coralogix vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.