We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Securonix Solutions and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)."It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities."
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."
"It operates on a single, extensive database which enables it to excel in detecting threats and anomalies across the network and endpoints, delivering a highly effective and comprehensive security solution."
"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."
"The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control."
"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."
"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the automated playbooks, which saves analysts time."
"Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task."
"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."
"Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part."
"It helps increase efficiency and productivity."
"The solution’s pricing and technical support could be improved."
"The support could be a bit faster."
"The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."
"Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous."
"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."
"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself."
"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."
"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."
"We've run into a few minor issues. Some of the playbook writing is a bit complicated. We've had a few hiccups with the source control. We'd really like to use GitHub deployment keys for a dedicated account. We haven't been able to do that. I think those are some of the major ones."
"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."
Cortex XSIAM is ranked 7th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 4 reviews while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. Cortex XSIAM is rated 9.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cortex XSIAM writes "A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Cortex XSIAM is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, CrowdStrike Falcon and Exabeam Fusion SIEM, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq, Tines and Swimlane.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
