We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our go-to solution for securing against the pass the hash attack vector and auditing privileged account usage."
"It's secure and reliable. I especially appreciate that it's locked down and only allows access to authorized components."
"It is a central repository. Therefore, if someone needs to access a server, then they go through CyberArk PAM. It provides a secure way to do this and CyberArk PAM records everything. For example, if you are connecting to a Linux server, then once you get into the Linux server and if it is integrated with CyberArk, it will automatically start recording everything that is being done. In most banks, seeing the recordings is very useful. If there are any gaps or something has happened which shouldn't have happened, then we can check the logs and videos. So, it gives security, in a robust manner, to the organization."
"We are able to rotate privileged user passwords to eliminate fraudulent use."
"We can make a policy that affects everybody instantly."
"PSM (Privilege Session Manager."
"It allows users to self-provision access to the accounts that they need."
"The technical support for this solution is very good. If I was to rate it on a scale of one to five, I would give it a five."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"The support services could act faster when people reach out to resolve issues."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar."
"The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"There should be more models and licensing plans for this software."
"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."
"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 143 reviews while ManageEngine PAM360 is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while ManageEngine PAM360 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine PAM360 writes " An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and Zscaler Internet Access, whereas ManageEngine PAM360 is most compared with Delinea Secret Server, ARCON Privileged Access Management, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and Delinea Privileged Access Service. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.