We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine Password Manager Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."It has helped us with our adoption with other teams, and it has also helped us to integrate it at the ground level."
"We found the initial setup to be easy."
"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable."
"CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale."
"Central Password Manager is useful for agentless automated password management through AD integration as well as endpoints for different devices."
"There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."
"The password vault and session monitoring are useful."
"The solution is stable."
"The security provided is very enhanced and it does a great job of keeping passwords safe."
"It is user-friendly. Someone who doesn’t have a lot of IT knowledge can work with the product easily."
"The support from the customer service team is good, they respond on time, and they always seem to be quite knowledgeable."
"It is very safe and we haven't had any security issues."
"I would like easier integrations for creating an online dashboard that executives would look at or are able to run reports from the tool."
"It should be easier to install. It is a comprehensive product, which makes it difficult to install. You need to have their consulting services in order to get it all installed and set up correctly because there is so much going on. It would be nice if there were an easier way to do the installation without professional services. I suspect they get a fair amount of their money from professional services. So, there is not a huge incentive."
"There is a lot of room for improvement in the report section. I also work on other tools, such as Thycotic, which allows you to create customized reports for your organization's needs. In CyberArk, there are limited reports, whereas in Thycotic or some of the other PAM tools, because the database is different, you can customize the report based on your needs through SQL queries."
"The major pain point that we have is the capacity of CyberArk due to the sheer volume of NPAs that we are managing. We are a large organization and we have hundreds of thousands of non-personal accounts to manage. We have already found out that there are certain capacity limitations within CyberArk that might introduce performance issues. From my perspective, something that would be valuable would be if the vault could hold more passwords and be more scalable."
"There is room for improvement in the availability of custom connectors on the marketplace for this solution. Additionally, their services for the CICD pipeline and ease of integration could be improved."
"Our DevOps team is looking in the direction of cloud, because we are not in it today. We are hoping to build it with Conjur from the ground up."
"I would love them to improve their UI customizing features."
"It is very complex and difficult to set up the solution."
"There is room for improvement in making the UI more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be improved and made more user friendly."
"It's a pretty technical solution. It's designed for more technical people."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ManageEngine Password Manager Pro Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 143 reviews while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Password Manager Pro writes "An affordable solution with good tech support, but room for improvement in making the UI more user-friendly". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, BeyondTrust Password Safe and AWS Secrets Manager.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
If you are looking for the best in class solution - there is actually only one.