We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Teramind based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Proofpoint, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in User Activity Monitoring."I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature."
"We are able to centrally manage credentials, touch applications, and rotate passwords."
"It enables us to secure accounts and make sure they are compliant."
"We are able to rotate privileged user passwords to eliminate fraudulent use."
"We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant."
"It is an extremely scalable solution."
"The automatic password management is the most important feature. The second most important feature is the ability to enforce dual control on the release of those passwords. The combination of these two features is the most important thing for us because we can show that we're in control of who uses any non-personal account, and when they do so."
"Our go-to solution for securing against the pass the hash attack vector and auditing privileged account usage."
"The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console."
"One thing that could be improved is to create of a better alternative for fixing group policy fees. We currently use Microsoft, but they have introduced new policies that may not be compatible."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"More than the product itself, there is room for improvement in the documentation. The documentation should be very detailed and very structured. It has a lot of good information, on one level, but I feel that it could be more elaborate and more structured."
"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."
"The documentation is rather basic and it is missing many use cases."
"The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots."
"As they grow, the technical support is having growing pains. One of the things is just being able to get somebody on the phone sometimes."
"It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers."
"The user experience should be improved."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in User Activity Monitoring with 144 reviews while Teramind is ranked 5th in User Activity Monitoring with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Teramind is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teramind writes "A stable solution that provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Teramind is most compared with ObserveIT and Veriato.
See our list of best User Activity Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.