We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Varonis Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The threat analytics is an important feature."
"We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability."
"The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out."
"The flexibility of integrating with other technologies is important because of a lot of applications - a lot of COTS products - are not supported when we are bringing the application IDs. The CyberArk platform provides a lot of opportunities to do customization."
"CyberArk has the ability to change the credentials on every platform."
"With PAM in place, we've experienced a significant reduction in potential security breaches."
"Our go-to solution for securing against the pass the hash attack vector and auditing privileged account usage."
"We have been able to manage application credentials in CyberArk, whether they come as a custom plugin or straight out-of-the-box."
"The solution has significantly improved data security and compliance posture by allowing us to track and monitor activities. We can see who accesses data and when files are created and understand what's happening in our environment."
"Varonis Platform is transparent and captures everything in the environment without impacting the performance. The tool helps us unify data feeds into a single reporting system."
"This product needs professional consulting services to onboard accounts effectively based user profiles."
"The current interface doesn't scale that well, and has some screens still in the old layout."
"I would like easier integrations for creating an online dashboard that executives would look at or are able to run reports from the tool."
"The initial setup was a bit complex."
"There should be more models and licensing plans for this software."
"For users to access a system via CyberArk Privileged Session Manager, a universal connector needs to be coded in a language called AutoIT and its support for web browsers is so-so. Other products like Centrify have browser plugins that can help automate the process when using their products."
"The turnaround time for technical support is lengthy."
"They need to provide better training for the System Integrator."
"The product is very complicated."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Varonis Platform is ranked 23rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Varonis Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Varonis Platform writes "Offers visibility and helps to keep track of access ". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Varonis Platform is most compared with Microsoft Purview, BigID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Veritas Data Insight.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.