DataStax vs ScyllaDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DataStax Logo
304 views|287 comparisons
ScyllaDB Logo
2,519 views|1,552 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DataStax and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use DataStax?
Pranv Kumar
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."
  • More ScyllaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively.
    Top Answer:I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive.
    Top Answer:It has just been a month or so for me with Scylla. The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved. Improvement of documentation is needed considering that I work… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    304
    Comparisons
    287
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,519
    Comparisons
    1,552
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 55% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    DataStax excels at managing large volumes of data across distributed settings, ideal for real-time analytics and scenarios demanding continuous availability. Known for robust scalability and high availability, it simplifies operations, enhancing organizational efficacy and decision-making. Widely used in finance, retail, and tech, it supports hybrid cloud environments and is valued for its operational simplicity and minimal maintenance needs.

    ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential​

    ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

    The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

    ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

    Sample Customers
    ING, Netflix, UBS, eBay, Constant Contact, Aeris, Arise, ClearCapital, Dyn, Engine, Noble Group, Pantheon, Target
    IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Educational Organization7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DataStax is ranked 15th in NoSQL Databases while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. DataStax is rated 0.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". DataStax is most compared with Cassandra and MongoDB, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase and Apache HBase.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.