We performed a comparison between Dell NetWorker and Veritas NetBackup Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a good product that can be integrated easily with the Data domain."
"The GUI is the best feature. It's very good and easy to use."
"If it's set up the right way, it's a stable product."
"NetWorker's most valuable feature is recovery, including the policy-based backups that can be configured."
"The solution is simple to understand."
"The response time of the tech support is swift. The support is fantastic."
"The software is quite complicated and useful for large corporations using different information systems."
"The backup capabilities and the automatization of the backup - along with the potential to make the back up on a virtual machine - are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"The documentation is okay. You are able to follow it and it is helpful."
"The reporting is very good compared to other tools."
"The most valuable feature is that the backup and restoring process is very fast."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it can be used in many different kinds of systems."
"We can add multiple appliances to the product."
"NetBackup Appliance's most valuable feature is the duplication encryption standard feature."
"We find the pricing is reasonable."
"The solution has a very easy-to-navigate user interface."
"The web console could be a lot better."
"The data storage capabilities should be improved."
"I would like to see encryption included in the next release to encrypt the data that we are backing up."
"The configuration is too complex."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"Support is definitely an area of concern because of the time it takes to resolve our issues."
"Currently, the NetWorker server only supports the Windows server bare-metal recovery, so an improvement would be built-in support for Linux and UNIX BMR."
"There should be more vendors incorporated into the solution."
"Depending on the setup structure, it can be complex to implement."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration and security."
"They could simplify the process of installing, and provide more space for data during the process."
"In terms of implementing the solution, it's quite technical. You need to be knowledgable in order to pull off a successful deployment."
"The price needs to be improved because it is really expensive."
"The NetBackup software is based on Red Hat Linux, but we should have multiple software options for that. We should have more OS options. Also, there are too many tools and intermediaries. Everything should be built into an all-in-one solution."
"The tool's pricing is expensive and could be lower."
"The desirability of appliance solutions is dwindling in the marketplace."
Dell NetWorker is ranked 14th in Backup and Recovery with 73 reviews while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is ranked 20th in Backup and Recovery with 46 reviews. Dell NetWorker is rated 7.8, while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell NetWorker writes "A stable tool that has an easy-to-use GUI that enables quick restoration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup Appliance writes "Offers good connectivity, easy to use and stable solution ". Dell NetWorker is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Dell Avamar, Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup and Commvault Cloud, whereas Veritas NetBackup Appliance is most compared with Veritas NetBackup, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), DD Boost, ExaGrid EX Series and HPE StoreOnce. See our Dell NetWorker vs. Veritas NetBackup Appliance report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
