We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"The feature of taking snapshots from the replicated volumes has allowed us to use them for DR testing to validate the application consistent point of recovery."
"We've found the support to be very good overall."
More Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] Pros →
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"The support is horrible."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult."
"The main pain point that we experienced is during device creation. For every newly provisioned volume, creating replication relationships between production and DR site, creating snapshots for third copy at DR site, and configuring them in appropriate replication groups and device groups means that there are lot of steps involved and a lot of room for error. There has to be a lot of checks and balances which need to be incorporated to make sure that the solution is set up correctly."
More Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] Cons →
Earn 20 points
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 17 reviews while Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Replication. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] writes "RPO and RTO have improved drastically". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync and NetApp Snapshot, whereas Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror and Hitachi TrueCopy.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.