We performed a comparison between Delphix and Talend Data Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Data Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Delphix interfaces are simple to use and very user friendly."
"The most valuable aspect is the product is easy to manage, with a good dashboard. We can easily configure it on the front end and back end."
"The product is efficient in handling large volumes of data."
"The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market."
"Data being available anytime is a life changer."
"Delphix can do data masking in any format. Not many solutions can do that."
"It's really easy to install."
"The most valuable feature is VDB provisioning."
"We can develop our own code if we do not see the functionality we need."
"I think Talend is one of the easiest tools for faster implementation compared to other tools."
"I like everything about this product, but the biggest thing is the ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is integration."
"The availability of connectors is great."
"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to understand."
"They're very competitive in terms of performance, which is a good selling point. It has very rich features. It provides a very rich feature set in the application."
"The solution is connected to various phones. It retrieves the configuration from the system."
"Delphix needs better partnerships from a customer perspective. It's how they sell it, not what they're selling."
"Delphix is a strong solution for virtualization, but it's not strong enough for creating data, so we have to use another solution for creating new data."
"The solution's price needs improvement."
"Delphix is quite expensive."
"My only complaint about this solution is the price."
"This product should be extended and made to be a more comprehensive storage solution."
"GUI could be improved."
"As a commercial model, it's very good. However, maybe it would be nice for Delphix to integrate with some other platforms."
"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."
"I've had some issues with bugs causing crashes, especially when making changes to the system or with the monthly upgrades to Studio they've introduced."
"The documentation from version to version could be more accurate."
"Performance and speed could be improved."
"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."
"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."
"They lack in memory capacity."
"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."
More Talend Data Management Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Delphix is ranked 1st in Test Data Management with 15 reviews while Talend Data Management Platform is ranked 22nd in Data Integration with 18 reviews. Delphix is rated 8.0, while Talend Data Management Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Delphix writes "Handles large volumes of data with ease, but the self-service portal must be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Data Management Platform writes "Built for everything and packed with features but there are some monitoring limitations". Delphix is most compared with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Denodo, Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and Actifio, whereas Talend Data Management Platform is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Talend Data Fabric, SAP Data Services, Collibra Catalog and SSIS. See our Delphix vs. Talend Data Management Platform report.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.