We performed a comparison between Denodo and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"Denodo makes it easy to export data as a service or data link to other services."
"Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"Denodo's best features are its performance, easy data transformation, and the job scheduler."
"The most valuable feature is the performance. Denodo is very useful, especially in this huge pharma environment. I've found that older SAP solutions were very tightly coupled to each other, which resulted in data restrictions. Getting data from different sources was tough and tedious. Compared to these old solutions, Denodo is very easy to work with for the analytical team. Now that we've implemented this virtualization layer, we are capable of getting the data very smoothly. We implemented a very small unit, but the performance and integration have been very good."
"Access to numerous forums and internet information."
"In general, it's good for us to make tests so we can scout the data."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"It is one of the best tools available for data integration."
"The solution is straightforward."
"The support is very good."
"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"REST API: Excellent for scripting control and reporting mechanisms"
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"Performance management could be improved."
"The data catalog certainly has room for improvement. It is functional but we look forward to development. We are in constant contact with Denodo and they are fully aware of our needs."
"The solution is slow when there are many virtualization layers."
"Denodo has some difficulty supporting large numbers of records."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"Monitoring event logs can be improved. In the older version, there was a monitoring schedule to get event reports and properly audit the reports. In the newer version, it is not there, and we have to manually configure data and audit events."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"I would like to see a connectivity option with third-party apps, for example, JDBC, and ODBC drivers. Currently, we need to install it separately from the Denodo side and then connect it."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"I would like to see more functionality added so that it is a bit closer to how much you can do with Informatica PowerCenter."
"The current features are a bit complicated, and we need to write big scripts and test."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"There is room for improvement at the highest level in terms of useability and connectors for various types of new applications. The row processing performance could be better because you experience some latency dealing with high volumes of data. Most organizations will be dealing with multiple cloud applications, so you could see performance issues moving from one system to another."
"We would like to have accessibility to the repository."
"Its pricing model can be improved. The response time from technical support can also be improved."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration can improve by being more user-friendly. When you're working with the solution a lot of technical knowledge is required. It's not a solution that anyone can use properly, you need knowledge of what's happening at the back end, such as SQL. When you get stuck, you need to look into your logic. For other tools, such as Dell Boomi, anyone can use them."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Denodo is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Integration with 29 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our Denodo vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.