We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."The pricing is reasonable."
"It is an advanced tool with multiple options available for the performance system."
"The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations."
"The ability to do multithreading. That's available in any performance testing tool, but the number of protocols that this particular tool supports has been very good."
"LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful."
"Graph monitoring is a valuable feature."
"I would rate Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional's stability at eight out of ten."
"The tool's most valuable features are scripting and automation."
"I recommend LoadRunner Professional as it supports many protocols and applications and is very easy to set up and use."
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
"The flexibility could be improved."
"You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests."
"Instead of having too many graphs and tabs, use the analysis section to get a more simplified defect analysis."
"The debugging capability should be improved."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees"
"If they can make LoadRunner more comprehensive, it would really help."
"LoadRunner Professional's parameter data could be improved."
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
More OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while OpenText LoadRunner Professional is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 76 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 9.0, while OpenText LoadRunner Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing writes "User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Professional writes "A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications". Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with Apache JMeter, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter and IBM Rational Performance Tester.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.