• Home
  • Adobe Experience Manager vs. TerminalFour Site Manager

Adobe Experience Manager vs TerminalFour Site Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
Adobe Experience Manager
Read 16 Adobe Experience Manager reviews
3,440 views|2,242 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
TerminalFour Logo
TerminalFour Site Manager
Read 1 TerminalFour Site Manager review
187 views|168 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager and TerminalFour Site Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Gaurav Mishra
Feature-rich, with a straightforward GUI, and an analytics dashboard that shows you the traffic source, number of...
The main benefit of using Adobe Experience Manager in the company is that it lets you easily manage your websites and content. You can also have a... Read more →
Sanjeev_Gupta
TerminalFour Site Manager Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."
  • "It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."
  • "Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

    • More Adobe Experience Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:Area of improvement for Cloud Service: For the last four years, I've been working on AEM as a Cloud Service. I feel the tool has all the features needed for production, but the problem is with skills… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:It's a powerful content management system – there's really no competitor in the market right now. The main use case is digital marketing. For example, if you have offers you want to publish… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 48 in Web Content Management
    Views
    3,440
    Comparisons
    2,242
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    635
    Rating
    8.2
    19th
    out of 48 in Web Content Management
    Views
    187
    Comparisons
    168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud
    Site Manager
    Learn More
    Adobe
    TerminalFour
    Overview

    Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers. 

    TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals.
    Sample Customers
    Metra
    University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise43%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    May 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe Experience Manager is ranked 3rd in Web Content Management with 16 reviews while TerminalFour Site Manager is ranked 19th in Web Content Management. Adobe Experience Manager is rated 7.8, while TerminalFour Site Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager writes "A powerful product that can be used for user experience, product design, and user journeys". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TerminalFour Site Manager writes "TerminalFour Site Manager Review". Adobe Experience Manager is most compared with Adobe CQ5, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, SharePoint, WordPress and SDL Tridion DX, whereas TerminalFour Site Manager is most compared with WordPress.

    See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.