Elastic Search vs Faiss comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
2,118 views|712 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Meta Logo
1,785 views|1,662 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Faiss based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Meta, Chroma and others in Vector Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Vector Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time analytics with Elastic benefits us due to the huge traffic volume in our organization, which reaches up to 60,000 requests per second. With logs of approximately 25 GB per day, manually analyzing traffic behavior, payloads, headers, user agents, and other details is impractical.""The flexibility and the support for diverse languages that it provides for searching the database are most valuable. We can use different languages to query the database.""Dashboard is very customizable.""The most valuable features are its user-friendly interface and seamless navigation.""The search speed is most valuable and important.""The solution has good security features. I have been happy with the dashboards and interface.""It is stable.""We had many reasons to implement Elasticsearch for search term solutions. Elasticsearch products provide enterprise landscape support for different areas of the company."

More Elastic Search Pros →

"I used Faiss as a basic database.""The product has better performance and stability compared to one of its competitors."

More Faiss Pros →

Cons
"It is hard to learn and understand because it is a very big platform. This is the main reason why we still have nothing in production. We have to learn some things before we get there.""I would like to see more integration for the solution with different platforms.""We'd like to see more integration in the future, especially around service desks or other ITSM tools.""The one area that can use improvement is the automapping of fields.""The GUI is the part of the program which has the most room for improvement.""There are a lot of manual steps on the operating system. It could be simplified in the user interface.""There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases.""We see the need for some improvements with Elasticsearch. We would like the Elasticsearch package to include training lessons for our staff."

More Elastic Search Cons →

"It could be more accessible for handling larger data sets.""It would be beneficial if I could set a parameter and see different query mechanisms being run."

More Faiss Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is an open-source tool."
  • "Faiss is an open-source solution."
  • More Faiss Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Top Answer:The product has better performance and stability compared to one of its competitors.
    Top Answer:We need to build many tools to streamline its integration into production environments. All the embeddings are saved in a particular location. We have to load them and start with the search in case of… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    2,118
    Comparisons
    712
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    2nd
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    1,785
    Comparisons
    1,662
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    218
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Milvus logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    OpenSearch logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Meta
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Faiss is a powerful library for efficient similarity search and nearest neighbor retrieval in large-scale datasets. It is widely used in image and text processing, recommendation systems, and natural language processing. 

    Users appreciate its speed, scalability, and ability to handle high-dimensional data effectively. Faiss also offers easy integration and extensive support for different programming languages. 

    Its valuable features include efficient search capabilities, support for large-scale datasets, various similarity measures, easy integration, and comprehensive documentation and community support.

    Sample Customers
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    1. Facebook 2. Airbnb 3. Pinterest 4. Twitter 5. Microsoft 6. Uber 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Spotify 10. Adobe 11. eBay 12. Dropbox 13. Yelp 14. Salesforce 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. Nvidia 18. Qualcomm 19. Samsung 20. Sony 21. Tencent 22. Alibaba 23. Baidu 24. JD.com 25. Rakuten 26. Zillow 27. Booking.com 28. Expedia 29. TripAdvisor 30. Rakuten 31. Rakuten Viber 32. Rakuten Ichiba
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    University8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vector Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Meta, Chroma and others in Vector Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Vector Databases with 59 reviews while Faiss is ranked 2nd in Vector Databases with 2 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Faiss is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Faiss writes "Works efficiently with smaller data sets, there could be an integration with automated products ". Elastic Search is most compared with Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search, Amazon Kendra and Qdrant, whereas Faiss is most compared with Chroma, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus and OpenSearch.

    See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.