Expressway Service Gateway vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
126
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
85
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
ActiveMatrix Policy Manager
Learn More
Overview
Intel Expressway Service Gateway (Intel ESG) is a software-appliance designed to securely expose or consume application services/APIs on-premise or in the cloud. It delivers cloud service brokerage capabilities including: integration, routing, data protection, middleware for legacy to mobile service enablement, and AAA security. Intel ESG is deployed as a low impact proxy at the network or cloud edge.
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is a distributed, standards-based SOA policy solution that provides the definition, distribution, and enforcement of policies across heterogeneous Java-, .NET-, and J2EE-based services. Leveraging this integrated policy management console, SOA architects can declare policies and apply them to heterogeneous, distributed services in a consistent way.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Children's Hospital, Dell SecureWorks, Effiage, Lavego, Novo Nordisk, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, U.S. Government Cyber Security, Vallourec

Expressway Service Gateway is ranked 2nd in SOA Application Gateways while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is ranked 4th in SOA Application Gateways. Expressway Service Gateway is rated 0.0, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Expressway Service Gateway is most compared with Actional Intermediary and Alcatel-Lucent OmniPCX Open Gateway, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is most compared with Actional Intermediary.

See our list of best SOA Application Gateways vendors.

We monitor all SOA Application Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.