We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices."
"I like all of the features, but the main one is the attack signatures."
"The support experience is better than average."
"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the overall capabilities, there is not a comparable solution on the market."
"With F5 Advanced WAF, it was protection for online publications and for our customers that caused us to choose the platform."
"It can scale."
"The solution is stable."
"I like them because I like the security solution. They get extra marks compared to other solutions or competitors. There are more features than any other product I can think of. They're always monitoring, and the security features offer more than other, lesser products."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"I would like to see a better interface and better documentation compatibility with other products. It's more complicated with OWASP."
"Nevertheless, F5 products are generally considered to be hard to deploy."
"F5 Advanced WAF could improve resource usage, it is CPU intensive. Additionally, adding automated remediation would be a benefit. For example, an easy button alerts us of the events that are occurring, and what we want to do at the time. An automated approach where somebody could be alerted very quickly. Instead of going and reconfiguring everything, an automated approach is what I'm looking at."
"One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy."
"F5 Advanced WAF could improve the precision of the scanning. There are many false positives. They should improve their threat database."
"They could provide better pricing."
"I would like to see the API Protection improved."
"I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
Earn 20 points
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 50th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
