We performed a comparison between F5 Shape Security and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."F5 Shape Security's most valuable feature is performance."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of configuration."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"IncapRules is one of the most valuable features, as you can create your own security and access control rules on top of your security policy. Using IncapRules we were able to easily block Layer 7 DDoS attacks several times."
"It blocks all types of attacks."
"It is a stable solution."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"The tool's price is high."
"I want the solution's custom exclusion rules to be more granular."
"It's quite expensive."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"Its price could be improved. It is quite expensive. It will be good if we could export the configuration. Currently, to control the configuration, we need to go to each website, which is not very convenient."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
F5 Shape Security is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews. F5 Shape Security is rated 8.6, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of F5 Shape Security writes "Easy to configure and blocks bot attacks for web users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". F5 Shape Security is most compared with Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications, Akamai App and API Protector and F5 Silverline Managed Services, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and Prolexic.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.