We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management.
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"Splunk has facilitated the correlation of information security logs to look for incidents which could cause damage to the company's infrastructure, as well as financial losses from leaks."
"It provides a risk score for each object, device, or user. We can then take action if they are at a higher risk."
"Low barrier to start searching with the ability to normalize data on the fly."
"The ability to ingest different log types from many different products in our environment is most valuable."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The logs on the solution are excellent."
"Splunk UBA is useful for fraud detection and for detection of APTs, advanced persistent threats."
"It scales better in the cloud than on-premise."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"The solution could use a different licensing model."
"The presence of multiple layers creates a significant challenge for monitoring across cloud environments."
"There is a definite learning curve to starting out."
"Not even Splunk's support guy, who came to our firm, could help with defining proper role management."
"The configuration could be better."
"I would like some additional AI capabilities to provide additional information about things going wrong and things going well."
"The algorithms customization of Splunk could improve. They have limited algorithms for machine learning support. If they can allow the user to add more machine learning algorithms, such as the ability to choose the algorithm that a user might want. Additionally, they should provide the required libraries for those algorithms, and then analyzes the data for use."
"The monitoring aspect of Splunk could be improved. We have to do some queries to get as much information as CrowdStrike or other solutions provide. If you run a big query, you will see a delay. That is the only concern we have because it will take some time if you query large data sets."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 228 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
