We performed a comparison between FatPipe SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"The next-gen features, the unified threat management capabilities are something that just about everybody is interested in at this point."
"The ease of setting the solution up is a valuable aspect for us."
"UTM/NGFW features and FortiCloud for logs and backups are awesome."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"Allows for firewall rules to be programmed and named in a way that makes it “readable”"
"It's very good and very stable for businesses. It works very well."
"We were looking for the VPN feature and controlling the inflow and outflow of all the traffic within the site and across the sites. We are also using it for the VPN and VLANs."
"The customization potential is quite impressive."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"The captive portal could be improved."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having more storage in the hardware for log data."
"The solution needs to improve its integration with cybersecurity."
"In the balance between links feature normally you can just choose one option to balance. It would be better for the solution to have more than one option, preferably three."
"The scalability could be better."
"I could not configure sFlow from the FortiGate graphical user interface. I realized that the sFlow configuration is available only from the CLI, and discovered that sFlow is not supported on virtual interfaces, such as VDOM links, IPsec, or GRE."
"Quality control on their firmware versions needs improvement. When they introduce new firmware, there tend to be bugs."
"We'd like more management across other integrations."
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review while Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 306 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and WatchGuard Firebox.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
