We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."The technical support for the solution is very good."
"Forcepoint DLP's most valuable feature is that it provides complete end-to-end security."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"Regardless of the size of your company, this solution can be scaled accurately."
"Forcepoint offers many policies that conform to global DLP best practices, including requirements specific to regions like the Middle East, Europe, etc. They have a policy database in their product. That feature is unique to Forcepoint. Their AI and fingerprinting are incredibly effective and robust. We have tested it multiple times. It always catches the correct data being leaked."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."
"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."
"It should integrate better with email."
"Lacks the ability to control the USB port devices so that content coming out of the port is blocked."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that."
"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"Usually for the biome of a small company, like 50 users, setup takes more than one week."
"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is ranked 28th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 1 review. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) writes "Provides an efficient access control feature but has a complicated setup process ". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is most compared with Varonis Platform, Safetica ONE, Trellix DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.