We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions."
"The product is user-friendly."
"The technical support for the solution is very good."
"The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents."
"The integration is great."
"The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives."
"It is a scalable product."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is a reliable product."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"We are able to check the log and keep records."
"We find the initial setup to be very easy."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"I am not able to get support directly from Forcepoint."
"Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use."
"The protection of personal data needs to be improved."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"The price could be reduced to be more cost, effective."
"The ease of deployment wasn't as flexible as Digital Guardian."
"The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that."
"The reporting features, the real-time reporting, can be improved in Forcepoint. On the dashboard, we don't have a feature that shows real-time incidents. We have to schedule a report in the environment."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
"Needs a remote login option."
"Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online or remote deployments, which sometimes face challenges with feature support. This is a common issue with Trend."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trellix DLP. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.