We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The interface is easy to use."
"The user management has been very easy for the most part."
"You can quickly filter your view of devices and zero in on the ones you want using a variety of tools, such as what subnet it is on or what it has been classified as."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, which does not require the use of an agent."
"The scalability is good."
"Forescout CounterACT has allowed us to better open our access and control wireless access globally from our HQ. This allows us to monitor the network access for every office globally. This has improved overall security, reducing risk and opening up the opportunity to provide greater end user flexibility."
"The initial setup is easy, taking no more than two or three weeks."
"Forescout Platform has granular features and one of the most impressive features is the agentless feature."
"The reports in Rapid7 InsightVM are useful when compared to competitors."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"I like Rapid7's scan optimization options."
"I have been in contact with technical support and they are not bad."
"The risk score that they provide makes it easier to find out the biggest risks. It helped the security officers to understand where the biggest risks are so that they can act on them. They can instruct their IT teams to give them a higher priority and mitigate them."
"NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the vulnerability scan."
"I believe that the overall user experience has not always been preferable."
"Better integration with third-party vendors is needed because as it is now, the list of third-party solutions that we can integrate and automate is quite limited."
"The initial setup was complex."
"In the next release of the solution, it could benefit from being more flexible to allow for more freedom."
"The biggest disadvantage is the pricing."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"The solution's customer support is bad and should be improved."
"The cost is too high."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"The product does not have the capability to do dynamic scanning of non-web applications."
"The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it."
Forescout Platform is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.