Fortify Application Defender vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
1,930 views|1,620 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,423 views|4,188 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Application Defender and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product saves us cost and time.""The tool's most valuable feature is software composition analysis. This feature works well with my .NET applications, providing a better understanding of library vulnerabilities.""The information from Fortify Application Defender on how to fix and solve issues is very good compared to other solutions.""Its ability to find security defects is valuable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology.""The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization.""We are able to provide out customers with a secure application after development. They are no longer left wondering if they are vulnerable to different threats within the market following deployment.""I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy."

More Fortify Application Defender Pros →

"For me, as a manager, it was the ease of use. Inserting security into the development process is not normally an easy project to do. The ability for the developer to actually use it and get results and focuses, that's what counted.""There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base.""It is easy it is to use. It is quick to find things, because of the code scanning tools. It's quite simple to use and it is very good the way it reports the findings.""The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features.""The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.""We leverage it as a quality check against code.""The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL.""The UI was very intuitive."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

Cons
"Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives.""Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking.""The solution is quite expensive.""Fortify Application Defender could improve by supporting more code languages, such as GRAAS and Groovy.""The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours.""The biggest complaint that I have heard concerns additional platform support because right now, it only supports applications that are written in .NET and Java.""The false positive rate should be lower.""The licensing can be a little complex."

More Fortify Application Defender Cons →

"HCL AppScan needs to improve security.""Many silly false positives are produced.""We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices.""The solution could improve by having a mobile version.""We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future.""There is room for improvement in the pricing model.""The dashboard, for AppScan or the Fortified fast tool, which we use needs to be improved.""There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. ​"

More HCL AppScan Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."
  • "The price of this solution could be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."
  • "Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."
  • "The product’s price is much higher than other tools."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."
  • More Fortify Application Defender Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is software composition analysis. This feature works well with my .NET applications, providing a better understanding of library vulnerabilities.
    Top Answer:I encountered many false positives for Python applications.
    Top Answer:I use Fortify to analyze projects in .NET languages.
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not vulnerable. In the ADSL feature managed, the primary objective is to identify… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by day, making it more efficient.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,930
    Comparisons
    1,620
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    325
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    5,423
    Comparisons
    4,188
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    351
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Logistics Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Retailer10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Application Defender is ranked 30th in Application Security Tools with 11 reviews while HCL AppScan is ranked 15th in Application Security Tools with 40 reviews. Fortify Application Defender is rated 7.8, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortify Application Defender writes "Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Fortify Application Defender is most compared with Checkmarx One, Coverity, CAST Application Intelligence Platform, SonarQube and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and OWASP Zap. See our Fortify Application Defender vs. HCL AppScan report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.