We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Ivanti Tunnel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"For our clients with remote sites and deployed firewalls, the filtering and authentication features are very helpful."
"It’s easy to use."
"The product is user-friendly."
"The solution is very scalable. It just depends on the number of licenses an organization has. The enterprise management console is related to the number of clients, and the client interface itself is free to download."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiClient is dual authentication and the VPN is secure."
"The return on investment was very reasonable. It was low cost and it functioned, so the return on investment was excellent."
"Compared to other similar solutions, it is faster in connecting."
"The integration of VPN services with endpoint security is valuable."
"The technical support team provides good services and faster response times."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Its stability can be improved. It is not as reliable as I would like it to be. There are times when things don't work quite right. Our biggest pain point is not related to Fortinet FortiClient and the whole scheme of things. It is related to one of the additional services called FortiGuard. They are the arm that does all of the updates to definitions, keeps all the signatures updated, and responds to new threats and whatnot. What we have found is that they react quickly, but sometimes their solutions aren't compatible with all of the components of the Fortinet security suite, specifically around FortiSandbox."
"We've had some problems with having to remove the current version and either reinstalling an old version or updating to the new one."
"The reports could be easier to set up."
"The user interface could be more inviting."
"It would be extremely useful to have an automatic updating feature."
"The solution could be more secure. I would like to see more safety features."
"The licensing feature of the product requires improvement since whenever the license expires, the tool logs out its users automatically, irrespective of whether they are on the network or not, which can be problematic for me."
"When we change our endpoint, we have to connect again, which means having to enter our credentials and permissions."
"The product's interface needs improvement."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 86 reviews while Ivanti Tunnel is ranked 19th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Tunnel is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Tunnel writes "Provides efficient data security and good technical support services ". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas Ivanti Tunnel is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and OpenVPN Access Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
