We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiDDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."
"The product allows the users to adjust the thresholds."
"I find the interface easy to use."
"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."
"The product's initial setup phase was really easy."
"It allows me to see all the traffic on my network."
"This solution can protect Layer 3, Layer 4 and Layer 7 attacks of applications for us."
"The solution already has security profiles and it can protect from DDoS attacks and other kinds of attacks."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"All of our traffic has to pass through the appliance, so we can very quickly mitigate the attack. This is a very valuable feature. On top of that, it's not only volumetric attack protection that the solution offers, but also layer 7 attack protection as well."
"The dashboard is the best part, and there is also the ease of operations."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"Radware DefensePro is one of the best solutions for on-premise protection."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"The solution can be a little more user-friendly and it can be more affordable."
"There aren't really any aspects of the solution we are unhappy with. It's been a positive experience overall."
"The only thing they need to do is to automate it. Today, you must create tools that do not require the use of an expert or anyone with special skills."
"The tool needs to focus more on the area of application traffic management, where it currently has some shortcomings."
"I would like to see analytics, big data."
"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."
"The web interface could be much better."
"Alerts and reporting features must be improved."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"I would like to see better implementation of a zero-day attack implementation strategy with self-mitigation."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
Fortinet FortiDDoS is ranked 16th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 22 reviews. Fortinet FortiDDoS is rated 8.4, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiDDoS writes "Offers good technical support but has poor scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Fortinet FortiDDoS is most compared with Arbor DDoS, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiWeb, Edgio Global CDN and Cloudflare, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and Corero. See our Fortinet FortiDDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.