We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."FortiGate IPS is really easy to use. I don't have any problems with this."
"You have access to CLI in case you have no web access."
"It does not require a lot of maintenance."
"I love the interface."
"Has a very user-friendly interface and doesn't require any prior knowledge."
"It's simple to operate and use."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate IPS are firewall and filtering."
"I prefer FortiGate because it has a lot of other solutions embedded within it and is the easiest for our technicians to operate."
"The solution is fast, flexible, and easy to use."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled."
"Splunk is more user-friendly than some competing solutions we tried."
"It's easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature is being able to take data and put it into other systems so that we could see the output, and to see where we need to apply our focus."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"There could be more modifications."
"I have contacted the support from Fortinet FortiGate IPS. The service was good but the speed could be better."
"We'd like to have multi-factor authentication via fiber."
"Fortinet can add some Machine Learning and AI to improve its accuracy and give it an edge on IPS detection and protection."
"Whitelisting could be better."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"The solution has limited scalability."
"The solution is not scalable."
"If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher."
"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."
"We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time."
"We'd like the ability to do custom searches."
"In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats."
"The correlation engine should have persistent and definable rules."
"There are occasional bugs."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiGate IPS is ranked 4th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 54 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 17 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate IPS is rated 8.4, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate IPS writes "Very stable with good network protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Fortinet FortiGate IPS is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Check Point IPS and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Cynet and Varonis Datalert. See our Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.