We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The support responds to our queries within two to four hours."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The users say that FortiNAC is configurable and easy to use."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"Provides containment and security and and carries out file analysis for cyber theft."
"This solution is very easy to implement and use. The interface is user-friendly."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
"Integration is hard in Fortinet FortiNAC, but they are evolving and getting better. For example, with Cisco, Aruba, Huawei, and Extreme devices, Fortinet FortiNAC is working properly, but some other devices have problems."
"One of the biggest issues with Fortinet FortiNAC is that it is not intuitive and has a high learning curve."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"I would like to be able to compare the configuration backup before and after."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 44 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Ruckus Cloudpath, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.