We performed a comparison between G-Core Labs CDN and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"On the real time, you can see live traffic, which is flowing into our website."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"Incapsula services also provides load balancing services for their service IP address environment. So far, with monitoring their services, the IP address was only changed once."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon CloudFront, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our G-Core Labs CDN vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.