GitHub Advanced Security vs GitLab comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
2,745 views|2,390 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
GitLab Logo
4,611 views|3,603 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub Advanced Security and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports.""Dependency scanning is a valuable feature.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.""The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem.""The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness.""GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

More GitHub Advanced Security Pros →

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team.""The best thing is that as the developers work on separate tasks, all of the code goes there and the other team members don't have to wait on each other to finish.""The most valuable functionality of GitLab, for me, is the DevOps. Besides the normal source control based on Git, I find the Auto DevOps features most important in the solution.""Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install.""CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features.""The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment.""Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective.""I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

More GitLab Pros →

Cons
"There could be DST features included in the product.""The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective.""A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial.""The report limitations are the main issue.""There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform.""The customizations are a little bit difficult."

More GitHub Advanced Security Cons →

"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents.""When deploying the solution on cloud and the CI/CD pipeline, we have to define the steps and it becomes confusing.""The integration could be slightly better.""GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would streamline the pipeline and make it more convenient for users.""Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good.""Reporting could be improved.""There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub.""It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More GitHub Advanced Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.
    Top Answer:The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective. In my company, the actual implementation phase takes time, though the tool is… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company to develop web applications and mobile apps. In my company, we use GitHub Advanced Security to check the vulnerabilities in the codes.
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,745
    Comparisons
    2,390
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    4,611
    Comparisons
    3,603
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitHub makes extra security features available to customers under an Advanced Security license. These features are also enabled for public repositories on GitHub.com.

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub Advanced Security is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 6 reviews while GitLab is ranked 7th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews. GitHub Advanced Security is rated 9.0, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub Advanced Security writes "A tool that provides ease of integration with the set of existing codes in an infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub Advanced Security is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Veracode, Fortify on Demand and GitGuardian Platform, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton. See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.