We performed a comparison between GitLab and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."
"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."
"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."
"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."
"The stability is good."
"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."
"The price of GitLab could improve, it is high."
"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."
"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem."
"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."
"GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness."
"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."
"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
