GitLab vs Octopus Deploy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
15,151 views|12,278 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Octopus Deploy Logo
1,690 views|1,201 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab and Octopus Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Release Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AbhishekSingh11
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features.""We use the Git repository and tagging feature. We are a product-based company and use this solution to move to a forward or backward tag.""It is a speedy platform compared to the others I have used. I have also enjoyed using the platform as this solution offers a good user experience.""I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.""Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains.""The stability is good.""The most valuable features of GitLab are ease of use and highly intuitive UI and performance.""The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

More GitLab Pros →

"The UI is very intuitive.""The rollback feature has been most valuable. We can write scripts from scratch. Octopus maintains an independent package for every deployment.""Deployment is valuable. It deploys well."

More Octopus Deploy Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain.""As GitLab is not perfect, what needs improvement in the solution is the Wiki feature of the groups or the repertories because currently, it's not searchable by default. You'll need an indexing service such as Elasticsearch to make it searchable, and that requires too much work, so for me, it's the main feature that should be improved in GitLab. In the next version of the solution, from the top of my head, the documentation could be improved. Besides the Wiki, it would be good if there's documentation that would be automatically generated based on the code repository. In other words, there should be some tutorials from GitLab for developers in the next release.""It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution.""GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker.""The integration could be slightly better.""The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly.""GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful.""It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

More GitLab Cons →

"This solution could be improved by making it easier to divide variables in YAML file or JSON files.""You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity.""There could be scope for more integration with other platforms."

More Octopus Deploy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."
  • More Octopus Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Top Answer:Deployment is valuable. It deploys well.
    Top Answer:You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity.
    Top Answer:We're a DevOps team., and its use case is deployment. That's the only thing it does. Our version is relatively recent.
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    15,151
    Comparisons
    12,278
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    8th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    1,690
    Comparisons
    1,201
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Octopus Deploy is the most popular deployment automation tool in the world. Our software is used by teams to deploy .NET, Java, Node, and database applications, to hundreds and thousands of servers in the cloud and on-premises.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Microsoft, NASA, Cisco, Domain, HP, Symantec, 3M, Philips
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 2nd in Release Automation with 70 reviews while Octopus Deploy is ranked 8th in Release Automation with 3 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Octopus Deploy is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Octopus Deploy writes "Easy to set up with intuitive UI and good reliability". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Octopus Deploy is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, UrbanCode Deploy, AWS CodeDeploy and Spinnaker. See our GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy report.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.