We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Platform based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Google Cloud slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Cloud Platform in this comparison. Google Cloud is very flexible, user friendly, and widely acknowledged. Users feel Oracle Cloud Platform is lacking some basic features and currently offers a very small portfolio.
"I could store any type of file using the solution."
"We are satisfied with the parameters of Google Cloud Storage."
"It's simple to use."
"From an availability perspective it's fantastic; from a security perspective it's fantastic."
"It is flexible and simple to use."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."
"Its performance and security features are valuable."
"It's very practical and reliable."
"I like that we can copy and download data using Azure. It's not just for file storage; we can also use it for large data sets or to host static web applications."
"The product is a reliable cloud solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability."
"My client had zero data loss while using the solution for backups and file security."
"The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them."
"It was easy to set up."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Implementations with other products are easy."
"It's actually quite complete and we don't have any issues with the solution."
"They need more enhancements in the security features."
"While the solution seems to be secure, I worry that, with the cloud, there is a chance of hacking. It would be ideal if they could be more transparent about the processes they go through to keep our data secure in the cloud and on their systems."
"It was a little more complicated when compared to Apple."
"The user experience needs to be simplified."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve by increasing the storage from 15 GB. If I want to have more storage I need to pay extra money."
"It would be better to assign storage usage to different categories, because storage capacity is cumulative, if your Google album and email are both full, you will be unable to send or receive email."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."
"The security could always be modernized."
"It would be helpful if we could remove data that we don't frequently access to reduce the cost of the storage."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"The support could improve."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 42 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
