We performed a comparison between HashiCorp Terraform and Spring Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."
"It is a stable solution."
"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"...Intune itself integrates with that entire Microsoft ecosystem. As an individual product itself, it's okay. It holds up. But when you start saying "I've bought this as part of a wider solution, as a company we are going Microsoft throughout," then it makes more sense to have Microsoft Intune... so you have that single dashboard."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The state backend, automated describe functionality, modular structures, and variablization using templates are most valuable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its simplicity of SQL language, its compatibility with multiple cloud providers, and its modules like the open source modules available, especially considering the fact that I work mainly on AWS."
"I like the function that shows me a preview of what is happening in the infrastructure."
"With Terraform, you don't need to understand the console of your cloud providers. You only need to understand how Terraform works, and you manage your infrastructure tools in Terraform."
"The ARM template is very easy to work with, which is a big help to us."
"The most valuable features of HashiCorp Terraform are automation and management capabilities."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the coding of our infrastructure. You can code it once and run it multiple times."
"The concept of infrastructure as code is quite intriguing. We have an infrastructure in our code and a state file where we can verify whether something is changed when it was changed, and who changed it. When we use Terraform, these kinds of things fascinate us."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward. The deployment process took me around ten minutes to fifteen minutes."
"It offers excellent scalability."
"Spring Cloud integrates well."
"It would be helpful if there was proactive remediation."
"The reporting needs to be a bit more interactive."
"A new Intune feature allows application packaging, but it incurs additional licensing costs for a significant number of applications."
"There is room for improvement in integrating additional features such as Purview and SharePoint activities into Intune."
"The solution could improve by having better integration with Apple."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"Intune should be much more granular in terms of supporting more Android cellular devices."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"Some areas where Terraform could improve would be challenges in managing sensitive information, especially when dealing with secret files or credentials."
"From a user's perspective, it would be great if a UI tool is made available in the open source version as well, but I don't think it may be introduced because of the high costs for it announced by HashiCorp in its licensed version...HashiCorp Terraform can improve backward compatibility."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"The integration with this solution needs to be improved."
"There is always room for improvement somewhere. I don't know everything about the product."
"Terraform lacks in running script."
"Community tech support could be a little better."
"This solution could be improved by adding features such as CDM to accelerate the access of data by the users."
"It would be beneficial for the framework to become more lightweight and efficient when transitioning to the cloud."
"If there's a dashboard like the ones provided by Apigee or Kong, that will be useful."
"Stability is one area in the solution that needs to improve."
HashiCorp Terraform is ranked 7th in Configuration Management with 38 reviews while Spring Cloud is ranked 19th in Configuration Management with 3 reviews. HashiCorp Terraform is rated 8.6, while Spring Cloud is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of HashiCorp Terraform writes "Easy to use, technically strong, and great for multi-provider or multi-cloud environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Cloud writes "Though the initial setup phase is straightforward, its stability needs to improve". HashiCorp Terraform is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, SaltStack, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, whereas Spring Cloud is most compared with AWS CloudFormation and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our HashiCorp Terraform vs. Spring Cloud report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.