We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reporting part is the most valuable feature."
"It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."
"It was easy to set up."
"AppScan is stable."
"The UI was very intuitive."
"This is a stable solution."
"We leverage it as a quality check against code."
"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"They have to improve support."
"Scans become slow on large websites."
"AppScan is too complicated and should be made more user-friendly."
"I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources."
"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."
"The pricing has room for improvement."
"There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. "
"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
HCL AppScan is ranked 15th in Application Security Tools with 40 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 7.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and OWASP Zap, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
